@neowaveap as the price is going up can we consider this marking? photo_2024-12-13_14-44-28.jpg
in combination patterns do we need to follow rule of alteration like first pattern is flat or zigzag then x wave then triangle or any complex pattern?...
@neowaveap in triangle you said c should be violent and d should be corrective but in diametric c is time-consuming and d is violent is it allowed and...
can you help me mark the pattern in the red circled area? also what could be the pattern forming in red E? Screenshot-2024-12-12-010025.png
@neowaveap what if yellow (C) got retraced in less time then the pattern after yellow (C) we could mark it as impulse 12345 as shown in the image, am ...
@neowaveap sorry but I didn't understand the first part of your sentence. can you explain it again in a bit of simple language?
Is this an irregular flat correction or reverse alteration triangle? photo_2024-12-11_11-35-43.jpg
@neowaveap in trending impulse patterns what should be the wave 2 price retracement? i heard that in impulse wave 2 should be equal or more than wave ...
@neowaveap the violent move is marked in purple and that should be the c wave becoz there a pattern is finished so why are you marking c further back?...
@neowaveap 1) second wave, do you mean by wave2 of impulse or wave b of flat zigzag triangle? 2) what about if the second wave goes beyond 61.8% ...
@neowaveap is this marking possible? i know we should be concern about more recent patterns but just to learn identification of pattern i am marking o...
@neowaveap suppose e of the contracting triangle is broken then what could be the next marking and how to deal with that.?
The wave in white rectangle retraced more than 61% of wave E after breakout of b-d trendline, is this ok photo_2024-12-10_10-38-56.jpg
Triangle breakout and wave coming back into the area of wave E after breakout so it is correct? photo_2024-12-10_10-38-27.jpg
@neowaveap if waves can be between 61.8 to 161.8% in terms of price and time then there is no use of the leeway of 15%?